Premiere Pro is engineered to take advantage of the GPU. You also should know that solid state drives (SSDs) are much faster that than hard drives that depend on a spinning disk. . with the Mercury Playback Engine (MPE), but - as is often the case with compatibility lists - it is at times slightly outdated as new products are continuously being released. To help give a sense of scale as to how much better using GPU acceleration is compared to using the CPUs only for rendering, we also included results with the MPE running in software mode (no GPU acceleration). This may change in the future (and you can make GeForce cards work fairly easily), but for now if you want 100% support from Adobe for Premiere Pro CS6 you will want a Quadro card. At the same time, the 970 has Maxwell architecture which is more efficient (145W TDP vs 250 on the gtx 780! Can you double-check that? I didn't want to include the image in the zip since it isn't our image and I want to make sure DriverHeaven gets proper recognition since we used their benchmark as a jumping point. Edit 10/3/2013: Interested in how workstation cards perform in Premiere Pro CC? In Adobe Media Encoder you can also set the Renderer at … We've had a pretty big issue with AMD's reliability in the past so we tend to avoid their cards unless there is a very clear reason to use them. (Adobe says that can't test every single Gpu). I'm using Premiere CS6 for a while now, but until today I had a non Nvidia GPU and therefore could not make use of the Mercury playback engine and GPU acceleration. Don't worry about it, we often help out people who don't own or for whatever reason can't purchase one of our systems. So you don't have to mess with any text files, but Adobe is still making it clear when you are using a card that is not officially supported. Any chance you could test with Adobe Premiere CS6 to see if the AMD cards work with that?  The rest of the models in that series won't be out until early 2013. ohh man no comparision to CPUs, sorry but really wasted time. The GTX 770 is a fairly high-end card, and while it is a generation old it should still do nicely :). For Quadro they have the latest cards, but the latest GeForce card I can see are the GTX 7XX series which are a generation old. Unlikely, since one is for ray-traced 3D rendering and the other is for general video rendering. For an application that doesn't support that calibration, your colors will appear over-saturated. The latest version - Creative Cloud - is more inclusive in terms of video cards than the past Creative Suite versions. Strangely, it did worse than the AMD Radeon HD 7750 and Radeon HD 7870 even though it is technically a much more powerful card. I would expect the graphics side of things to perform a little better than the Intel HD graphics on the chart above, but behind the other AMD Radeon dedicated cards listed there. The new Adobe Mercury Graphics Engine(2) within Photoshop CS6 utilizes both OpenCL and OpenGL(TM), to accelerate new and existing features such as the new Blur Gallery that runs up to 10x as fast(1) on the upcoming "Trinity" APU with OpenCL GPU acceleration turned on. No AMD video cards work with the GPU acceleration in CS5 / CS6, unfortunately. These are user-submitted, but they include some decent GPU compute benchmarks. Adobe and AMD ran a series of tests to see just how much difference GPU acceleration made in the new Mac Pro. The odd point in our benchmarks is the AMD Radeon HD 7970. For Photoshop CS6, the GPU accelleration is done via OpenCL - which means that any modern video card (NVIDIA, AMD, or Intel) will work... just to varying degrees. To help with that, we also formatted the data in three other ways including the benchmark time compared to the fastest card and how many more/less minutes a one hour render/encode would take. I didn't even realize I was posting in your company's forum until you replied.  You can see that comparison in the article above: look for the three small graphs a little below the big one, and enlarge them (click on them) to see that info. Sorry, took you a bit further off the topic at hand :). Open a new session of Premiere, Goto "Project Settings" "General" and under Video Rendering and Playback "Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration… It doesn't do any good, and often the questions asked are ones that our own customers might benefit from in the future. There are also work-arounds for Premiere Pro CS5 and CS6 to allow some video cards that aren't officially supported to work anyway. To do this, we will take a sample of the effects that Adobe says are GPU accelerated and benchmark them using various Intel, NVIDIA, and AMD graphics cards to see the performance differences between each card. Warning: Many of the cards we test below are not on Adobe's official list of compatible cards. Hi, how does a Skylake 6700k system relate to this? I've never given that any thought, but I completely understand how long term use of a trackpad or mouse could cause issues. Most of the time, double precision computing is not really needed since there is nothing in the code that needs results that precise. I'm using rovi codec pack to import mpeg 2 video format. The NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 is understandably the slowest performer since it does not support OpenCL, but you can see the massive increase in performance it received with the 13.0.1 update. GPU-accelerated effect performance enhancements This tutorial shows how to identify accelerated effects, and to activate GPU support. The list of graphics cards that are compatible with Adobe® Premiere® Pro CS6 is updated on a regular basis. I used only one light curves as effect. Quadro is really only necessary if you use a 10-bit display since GeForce doesn't support that. So I started working on a CS:GO montage but when I put the zoom transmission and turbulent displacement on my clips it said GPU Acceleration required. Multi-camera editing workflow; Editing workflows for feature films; Set up and use Head Mounted Display for immersive video in Premiere Pro; Editing VR; Best Practices. If you are fine not being completely covered, however, a GeForce card is going to give you much more "bang for the buck". Also, I would highly recommend the drive for software also be a SSD... and while you are at it, might as well build all of this in a higher-quality Puget Genesis system rather than a HP :). Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. Adobe's MPE hardware acceleration uses the discrete GPU only as needed during certain operations (effects, scaling/resizing, frame rate changes). This is a great way to easily improve performance, but it adds more complexity to the question of "what hardware do I need" since until now the video card was not a major factor in the performance equation. Those versions only had CUDA support, which is exclusively a NVIDIA technology. Thoughts? This is basically a beta of the PPBM6 benchmark, so our results may not line up 100% with the final version. Buuut, I cannot work without a pointing stick because I'm so used to it and cannot use a touchpad or even a mouse anymore without stress. I really should have included them in the article from the get-go, it just completely slipped my mind. So unless you consistently use effects that are GPU accelerated, I would recommend the K1000M over the K2000M and use the difference in price to get a faster CPU and an SSD. We fully expect this to result in a serious performance hit, but it will work well as a baseline to compare the other cards against. Just a quick note about this since I've been working with Premiere Pro CC this last week. A free-standing mouse is my preference now, though, as you can use one with a desktop or laptop. So the question of GeForce vs. Quadro is really about whether or not the program is designed to need double precision from the GPU or not. Under Renderer, choose the GPU acceleration … Great post by the way. I don't believe programs like this benefit at all from multiple video cards. I discovered a cool workaround that can speed up Adobe Premiere running on a Mac. Note that many of these effects require that GPU acceleration is enabled, so even if you have a card that does not fully support OpenCL, this box must be checked in order for all of the effects to function properly. Of course, those processors also cost less - so it can make a great value platform (as in the case of the AMD version of our Spirit system). Hello I have no experience working with computers that have a GPU so I have no frame of reference for a new purchase. If you would like to see the individual benchmark times for each effect, feel free to click on any of the thumbnails below for a closer look. You don't get extra performance out of having extra video memory, so in that case it is better to get the card with more cores. We just did a follow-up to this article where we focused on workstation graphics ( http://www.pugetsystems.com... ) and we found that in Premiere Pro, you tend to hit a performance wall at some point where the CPU becomes the bottleneck. If I'm in the $200-250 range for cards, which NVIDIA card would be my best bet to purchase? then just start a new project with cuda accelerated mercury engine. However, while there is extensive graphics card support from Premiere on PCs, it is very limited on the Mac. Matt is going to be working on a Premiere Pro article next, as I understand it... but I wouldn't hold out any hope for AMD cards. HP Z820 workstation with two Intel quad 2050 processors, Nvidia K2000 with K20 gpu, 20 gb ram, 3 hd drives, 1 for software, 1 for actual file, 1 solid state for Photoshop scratch, if you want to go off the deap end add up 512gb ram, upgrade to two Nviidia K20x gpu's and get another solid state drive for working files. In addition, some of the higher end Quadro card (the 5000 and 6000) also use ECC memory for their video RAM which greatly increases reliability. (Optional) Multiple GPUs, including … Maybe there are plugins that can utilize them? Not at the moment, although we are getting ready to do this with the newer Quadro and FirePro cards. Once you have that sorted out, you can make use of our benchmark results to determine which video card is right for you to use with Adobe Premiere Pro CS6. I just came across the forum topic in google. - Adobe Premiere Pro Forum I don't think the K20 or K20x cards help Photoshop at all - at least, not the base software. So for 1080p a 6700K is pretty good (but not best), but for 4K+ it will start to lag behind other CPU options. While this benchmark is not yet released, our testing showed that it is very good at accurately showing the differences between video cards. Here are my PC specs: Windows 10 Home (64b) Intel i7 @3.70 GHZ, 6 cores Gigabyte Technology Mobo RAM: 32GB DDR4 GPU: GTX 1070 Several TB of HD space + SSD It works if I use software Mercury engine. Specifically, Adobe has only announced support for the graphics cards in MacBook Pros. With the massive price drops in used GTX 580 GPU's... What would you recommend as the better buy? Now that you are looking at C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Premiere CS5 in command prompt, type GPUSniffer.exe and press ENTER. Most cards today use RAM in increments of 1GB, so when shopping for a video card you want to look for one with at least 2GB of vRAM. This testing greatly pre-dates the i7 6700K. Also, check out Creative COW's Premiere Pro podcast. Although if you did decide to go with a GTX 650, we would highly recommend using a 2GB version. 3. If you are only doing light video editing, I would go with the 650 Ti 1GB. Plus, you are the perfect example of how it often also earns us word of mouth recommendations! Overall, I probably wouldn't worry about upgrading if you already have a GTX 780 or 780 Ti, but if you are looking for a new card I would go with the GTX 970 - especially since it is often half the cost of a GTX 780Ti. The main differences are that Quadro cards have better double precision performance (completely not needed outside of some engineering and scientific applications), the higher end cards have ECC memory (again, not needed except for some engineering and scientific programs), and the firmware is optimized a bit differently. Sorry to say that but the part with double vs single precision is totally nonsense.Double precision float is only important for scientific purposes like calculating fluid dynamics, modeling the weather and other simulations.Premiere Pro won't render images any more precise with FP64 than with FP32. Can you tell me more about your Wide Gamut Screens? The main feature of Quadro is their double precision performance which allows the card to be many times more precise. Kudos for keeping your articles about CS6 online and available.Some of us are quite happy with owning our CS6EE outright, and not needing CC features, nor being held for monthly ransom. If you would like to run this set of actions on your own computer, you can download them here: Download Link. But that is very likely to be years out, so it is likely not worth planning for at this moment. His card, as seen in the link above, is already listed as supported. But after upgrading to CC2018 I can never use GPU acceleration. Can you afford the new GTX 750 Ti? Is the Quadro K2000M worth the additional cost? The wide gamut screens provide a richer color spectrum -- most useful for photographers who calibrate their screens and want to be able to see the best visual representation of their work. See this post for some more info: http://www.pugetsystems.com... Hello. It simply hasn't been long enough (and we haven't sold enough) for us to determine if that is true. The performance boost from things like that, which include NVIDIA's SLI technology, are generally limited to some games and a handful of other 3D applications. I've heard that consumer grade GPUs like the Geforce cards - while faster than CPU (software) alone or Quadro cards, typically produce poorer results, like artifacting, etc. Ofcourse, anything cheaper than that range would be even better! Is it extra graphic card is required for adobe photoshop cs6????? It added OpenGL acceleration, which works on AMD cards. While we did not see any problems in our testing with these 'incompatible' cards, technically these are unsupported configurations and our expectation is that Adobe Support would treat them as such if you ever needed their help. TN. However, please note that the processor side of the Trinity platform is decidedly slower than any of the Intel processor types we tested in this article... so while the graphics side will benefit Photoshop somewhat, the CPU side would perform worse than what was tested above. Using a 45min 1080p video 5mbps bitrate with 192kbps audio- With HW acceleration from iGPU: 20:04 (m:s) CPU Only: 22:37 (m:s) Thats about a 10% performance boost. Initial failure reports are looking much better for the 300 series, however, so if you are really considering a 290x or 390x, definitely go with the 390x. CC does check if the card is on their supported list, but all that happens if the card is not on the list is you get a one-time pop-up saying something along the lines of "this card is not officially supported" when you first enable GPU acceleration. I like the full-size ones, that fit your hand really well, rather than the small / ultra-portable ones. I am a Premiere Pro CS6 user as well and the GPU acceleration does make a difference. Really, when you get down to the actual GPU core, GeForce and Quadro cards are really not all that different. After reading online about the advantages it gives, I decided to sell my ATI card and bought a Nvidia GTX 660 today. As I understand it with AE its all about the processor. To ensure video acceleration was enabled, we made sure that the "Use Graphics Processor" was enabled under Edit -> Preferences -> General -> Performance before each round of testing. We are starting to get ready for another round of these GPU acceleration articles with newer hardware, so if you can wait a few months, we should have actual Premiere Pro benchmark results for Haswell . Hi there, I have a graphics card question. I will be doing heavy photo editing, and some video editing (possibly a good amount I'm not sure yet). It depends on how much video RAM you need. Do any photo editing programs utilize CUDA? Sadly the only folks still using them are Lenovo at this point, and not even on all their models. Here are my recommended laptop computer systems for both Mac and PC users. So based on that, X79 should still be better than Haswell, but only by something like 15-20%. after reading your article, i'm ready to purchase a nvidia gtx 650 to take advantage of mpe on premiere cs6... but have to questions: 1) my mobo is an "old" intel dp45sg, which has two PCI-E 2.0 slots, and this card is PCI-E 3.0. will i have any trouble (incompatibility, performance loss) because of this? While a GTX 650 1GB would add an extra 3.5 minutes to a one hour render/encode, and a GT 610 would add 40-60 minutes, using just software only would add roughly four additional hours.