Benchmarks zeigen die Performance. We tested 11 relatively demanding games on both GPUs with maximum and medium settings enabled. time this graphics card was released. Where the Radeon maybe 5% to 10% cheaper, it’s also 5% to 10% slower in many cases. Despite having the superior on-paper specifications and equivalent software features, in a competition of might, the GTX 1660 outperformed the RX 5500 XT in almost every test we threw at these two cards. 9400F 9600K. Excellent performance at 1920 x 1080. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. GeForce GTX 1660 Memory: 6144Mb GDDR5 DESKTOP Release date: 15 Mar 2019 . Aber die 1660 super ist das max was mein Budget hergibt. 84. Are you getting sudden frame drops? Performance profile from 183,907 user samples. Nvidias GTX 1650 Super hat dagegen nur 4,0 GByte VRAM zu bieten, während die GTX-1660-Modelle … 125 +4%. 87. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS YouTube *NEW* COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT × COMPARE. Nvidia’s GeForce Experience software is a reasonable equivalent to AMD’s Radeon Software Adrenalin. On the other hand, the RX 5500 XT 4GB is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 169. Compare that to the Radeon RX 5500 XT, which features a clock speed of 1717 MHz and a GDDR6 memory speed of 1750 MHz. $160 55 36 … CPU; GPU; SSD; HDD; RAM; USB; GPU RANKINGS. - Seite 3 96 +7%. If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. demanding games. Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5500… Bottlenecks An AMD Ryzen 3700X bottlenecks a 2070S: the 3700X costs 40% more money for 11% less performance. And Nvidia had not yet launched the RT and Tensor core-free 16-series Turing GPUs for the mid-range market. Jetzt aktualisiert: Radeon RX 5600 XT im Test: Mit der neuen RX 5600 XT attackiert AMD die GTX 1660 Ti und RTX 2060. Durch den Verbrauch gebremst wird die GPU im Test nur in Grid sowie Metro Exod… The company’s Radeon Software allows you to monitor your GPU’s temperature, fan speed and voltage, adjust the graphics settings for your games, access performance reports and game states, and update your GPU drivers. AMD 5600-XT $300. AMD ’s xx00 cards have always been defined by entry-level prices with performance that knocks on the door of mid-range graphics cards – especially when overclocked. 9600K. NVENC allows the CPU to send a single set of instructions to the GPU, which the GPU uses to output to your display and broadcast without impeding performance. Each card supports automated game optimization, game streaming, and driver update software. 0.1% Low(Avg) 0.1% Low(Max) 1% Low(Avg) 1% Low(Max) 128 +7%. 91. The GTX 1660 is much more cheaper than the GTX 1060 6GB as it costs $ 220. And they both support performance optimization features that maximize your gameplay experience. Stutters & Frame Drops. 103 +7%. Finde heraus welches besser ist und dessen gesamt Leistung in der Grafikkarte-Bestenliste. Although it operates at a higher frequency and produces higher peak floating-point performance (5.2 TFLOPS vs the GTX 1660’s 5 TFLOPS). 1660-Ti 5600-XT 2060. The GeForce GTX 1660 falls right in the middle, with 6GB of graphics memory. SPEED RANK: 55 th / 652. Best Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3822) ≥ … IMHO the 5500 XT is a bit overpriced, but they seem to have decent headroom. Watch Gameplay. Compare this to the GTX 1060 6GB, which came originally at a price of $ 254. In The Division 2, Gears of War 5, Strange Brigade, Far Cry 5, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy XIV, Forza Horizon 4 and Battlefield V both cards managed to drive 60 fps average gameplay with the graphics settings maxed right out. AMD 5600-XT $300. 101 +11%. Ich tendiere zur 1660 super, wegen mehr Leistung. Ansel also offers free-camera capture, which allows you to snap angles that aren’t possible in-game, and the ability to capture 360-degree images. Auch wenn das erste BIOS der Sapphire Radeon RX 5600 XT Pulse maximal 160 Watt und das zweite BIOS nur 135 Watt erlaubt, taktet die Navi-10-GPU in Spielen meistens sehr ähnlich. 103 +7%. Maximum recorded temperature under load. AMD’s Radeon RX 5500 XT features a TDP rating of 130w, whereas Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1660 includes a TDP rating of 120w. Gaming performance index. Ansel even supports RAW EXR output, which allows you to make changes to the image in post-processing, such as create HDR-enhanced images. AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT im Test - Benchmark-Vergleich mit GTX 1660 Ti und RTX 2060. The Radeon RX 5500 XT supports both FreeSync and FreeSync 2, whereas the GeForce 1660 is compatible with Nvidia’s more-expensive G-Sync adaptive display technology. NY 10036. PC Details $943 +7% +10% +24% +25% +10%. Intel 9600K $187. The lost performance is similar to downgrading from a 2070S to a 2060S. Both AMD and Nvidia offer support for adaptive display technology. PC Details $875 +6%. Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. VS Watch Gameplay. For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Apex Legends, F1 2019, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 2 at 60 fps to 65 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 62 fps. On the budget end of the GPU market, power consumption shouldn’t really be much of concern. AMDs RX 5500 XT liefert sich im Test ein Duell mit Nvidias Spieler-GPUs im Preisbereich von 200 Euro. Strangely, the RX 5500 XT is a stronger competitor with medium settings, but why would you settle for medium if you don’t need to? 116. What a difference a year can make. 90. Radeon RX 5500 XT im Test: Die Taktraten sowie Benchmarks in Full HD / Die tatsächlichen Taktraten unter Last / Benchmarks in 1.920 × 1.080 Operates quietly. 200W power limit. Nvidia also supports a select few FreeSync displays. Die Radeon RX 5500 befinde sich damit praktisch auf dem Niveau einer Geforce GTX 1660, bei der 128 und 10 Watt gemessen wurden. Our tests with Gigabyte’s GeForce GTX 1660 OC 6G showed that it peaked at a 68C. Nvidia does provide a larger 192-bit memory bus versus AMD’s 128-bit memory bus configuration, but the faster memory more than makes up for the difference in bus size. Compare graphics card gaming performance in 49 games and in 1080p, 1440p, and 4K at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low quality settings. RX 5500 XT 4GB versus GTX 1660 performance comparison. $1,000. Kann sie sich gegen GTX 1650 Super & Co behaupten? 1660-Ti 9600K Source. Radeon RX 5500 Memory: 8192Mb GDDR6 DESKTOP Release date: 7 Oct 2019. Even if the RX 5500 XT 4GB consistently delivers frame rate increases over the RX 570, the gain is not much to justify an upgrade. You tested the old 1660, and the 8GB RX 5500? Bottlenecks An AMD Ryzen 3700X bottlenecks a 2070S: the 3700X costs 40% more money for 11% less performance. We compared the features and benefits of the Radeon RX 5500 XT and the GeForce GTX 1660 in four categories -- featured technology, game performance, power consumption & heat output and Value -- to help you decide which of these two cards is right for you. AMD’s Radeon RX 5500 XT features a TDP rating of 130w, whereas Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1660 includes a TDP rating of 120w. RX 5500 XT: GTX 1660 Ti: BUY NOW: BUY NOW: PROS: PROS: Competent 60 fps 1080p performance. Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the The RX 5500 XT has a 187 MHz higher core clock speed and 40 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1660.This results in the RX 5500 XT providing 85.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 takes full advantage of Nvidia’s NVENC hardware encoder technology, which lowers the CPU overhead associated with software encoding. AMD recently launched the Radeon RX 5500 XT, which aims to capture the attention of mainstream gamers with a mid-range budget to spend on a GPU. 13 Nov '19 Driver:441.8. 1660-Ti 9600K Source. Unfortunately, gaming performance was not quite as impressive. GeForce GTX 1660. Intel 9600K $194. We tested two examples of the RX 5500 XT, a 4GB Sapphire and an 8GB Gigabyte card, and we found that, in-game, the AMD card will average close to 100w. 101 +7%. AMD bietet die Radeon RX 5500 XT sowohl mit 4,0 als auch mit 8,0 GByte VRAM an. Raspberry Pi Welcomes IQaudio To the Fold, Newegg's Revised Return Policy Angers Customers, Cyberpunk 2077 Bug Bulldozes AMD Ryzen: Here's a Fix, Tested, Cyber Prusa: The Official Cyberpunk 3D Printer Mod by Prusa, MSI's GF65 Laptop Drops to Just $899 at Newegg. Elevated GPU Boost frequency. Big thermal solution for a 120W GPU. AMD. CONS: CONS: 4GB variant is notably slower in certain titles. It’s an exciting time to be in the market for a new GPU, with several new products on the market in the last 12 months. 96. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go. For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates. Winner: Tie. More demanding titles such as Borderlands 3 and Metro: Exodus, we had to drop the settings to medium to achieve the coveted bare minimum of 60 fps. Kann sie sich gegen GTX 1650 Super & Co behaupten? The higher the better. It also makes … For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Need For Speed: Heat, Just Cause 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, Gears of War 5 at 67 fps to 72 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 69 fps. Kann sie sich gegen GTX 1650 Super & Co behaupten? 98 +13%. 4K performance at 2160p resolution. 1660-Ti 9600K Source. And as for performance, both AMD and Nvidia offer dynamic clock speed boosting technologies that automatically overclock your GPU to maximize the capabilities of your hardware configuration. The lower the better. Clarity or Details? 1660-Ti 9600K … However, AMD’s option still delivers acceptable performance and costs a few dollars less, which somewhat evens that playing field. As a result, the TU116-300-A1 is nearly twice the size of NAVI 14 XTX at 284 mm². The higher the better. Was ist der Unterschied zwischen AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT und Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti? You likely won’t be concerned with the power requirements for these cards, but higher power draw does equate to higher heat output, which is likely of higher concern to you. However, for just a few dollars more you can get better gaming performance from a GeForce GTX 1660. New York, Even if the GTX 1660 consistently delivers frame rate increases over the GTX 1060 6GB, the gain is not much to justify an upgrade. Watch Gameplay. We can’t call the Radeon RX 5500 XT a bad deal. The two cards nobody should buy? Average Fps. Jetzt mit Custom-Designs im Benchmark: Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super im Test. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and … AMD. TEST YOUR GPU. VGA Benchmarks; Radeon RX 5500 vs GeForce GTX 1660; Radeon RX 5500 vs GeForce GTX 1660. Aber bin mir noch nicht 100% sicher Welche GPU. 5600-XT 9600K Source. 125 +8%. Nvidia’s configuration appears much more capable of handling games with maximum graphics settings enabled than AMD’s. Turing GPUs are also manufactured on TSMC’s finFET process, but Nvidia is working with a larger 12nm process. 120. Much more efficient than Polaris. 28 Jan '20 Driver:20.1.3 . Watch Gameplay. AMD offers a variety of software features for the Radeon RX 5500 XT. ComputerBase hat 29 Grafikkarten und 5 iGPUs von AMD, Nvidia und Intel im MMORPG World of Warcraft im Benchmark-Test. For 2160p 4K, we were able to play Valorant at 94 fps to 94 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 94 fps. 116%. Ghost Recon: Breakpoint was also very demanding, and our Radeon was unable to crest 50 fps at max settings. Das liegt daran, dass die Grafikkarte auch mit dem zweiten BIOS eigentlich nur selten ins Powerlimit läuft, die GPU benötigt in Spielen so gut wie nie mehr als 120 bis 130 Watt. Winner: Nvidia. © I would have given features to AMD easily for the goodies they add to their driver suite. Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. UserBenchmark USA-User . Klar ich weiß das die 1660 super leistungsstärker ist, bin mir aber immernoch nicht 100% sicher. Thanks to TSMC’s 7nm finFET process, AMD’s GPU fits on a 158 mm² die. Following our review, we already know it’s not as powerful as Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1660, but can it offer enough value to make up for what it lacks in performance? 0.1% Low(Avg) 0.1% Low(Max) 1% Low(Avg) 1% Low(Max) 128 +10%. Both the Gigabyte and Sapphire Radeon cards topped 120w in this test, with the Sapphire model touching 136w at its peak. 100%. It also features 1536 SPUs, 96 TAUs, and 48 Raster Operation Units. Intel 9600K $194. None of the GPUs of this calibre draw anywhere near enough power to make a significant difference in your system’s configuration. 9600K. The RX 5500 XT also offers faster GDDR6 memory compared to the GTX 1660’s GDDR5 memory modules. Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, The higher capacity of faster GDDR6 memory also gives it a significant advantage. Winner: Nvidia. 1660S 9600K … GeForce Battles Radeon in the realm of $200 gaming cards. 13 Nov '19 Driver:441.8. Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. ADD TO PC BUILD. 116. Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. Winner: AMD. driver support. This time around, the tables have turned and Nvidia has captured the mid-tier crown back from AMD. 9400F 9600K 9700K. AMD’s NAVI 14 XTX features 6.4 billion transistors, which is 200 million fewer than the Turing TU116, but AMD crammed its chip into a much smaller package. The graph shows lowest Fps (slowest frame) in one second buckets. For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, Death Stranding, F1 2019, Far Cry New Dawn, Apex Legends at 62 fps to 67 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 65 fps. At 1440p we see similar margins, the 5500 XT is still on par with the GTX 1660 … It’s far and away a better card than you would have bought for the same price a year ago. I'd like to see those cards tested battling while overclocked. If you compare these cards at the same price, the GeForce GTX 1660 is the clear winner. GeForce Experience also includes Nvidia’s advanced screenshot capture technology, called Nvidia Ansel, which allows you to capture extremely high-resolution (up to 33x 1080p) images of supported games. The graph shows lowest Fps (slowest frame) in one second buckets. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. BTR received a Sapphire Pulse RX 5500 XT OC 4GB ($169) review sample from AMD on Monday, and we benchmarked it using 46 games versus the RX 570 4GB, the RX 590 8GB and versus the GTX 1660 6GB (non-Super). AMD’s NAVI 14 XTX GPU features the same number of cores (1408) as the version of Nvidia’s Turing TU116-300-A1 chip found in the GTX 1660. Noise Levels under load. Based on 96 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 5500 and the RX 6900-XT, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. However, the low heat output from the Radeon RX 5500 XT, likely aided by its smaller 7nm process, gives AMD a leg up in this category. For several generations, the Radeon team has focused its attention on mainstream cards like the RX 480, 580, and 590 (all based on the same Polaris architecture). The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future The Sapphire Pulse RX 5500 XT OC 4GB Benchmarked with 46 games vs. the Red Devils RX 570 4GB & RX 590 8GB and vs. the EVGA GTX 1660 XC 6GB. What affects game performance? The GTX 1660 Super was 11% faster, though the 5500 XT was 8% faster than the GTX 1650 Super. The cheaper the better. It’s also worth noting that the fans on the GeForce were spinning at 2000 rpm, and the Radeon card spun at a leisurely 1800 rpm. Today, we’ve got myriad options from team red, including the recently launched Radeon RX 5500 XT, which introduces Navi to the high-volume segment of the market, in the $200 price range. Get instant access to breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips. 13 Nov '19 Driver:441.8. Best Bench: 75% Gigabyte(1458 4013) Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 4013) Poor: 67% Great: 75%. Interestingly, the Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 peaked around 100w in our Furmark stress test, whereas the Gigabyte sample drew around 130w for this test.