from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using multi-threading system calls, Information in this table was AMD Athlon II X4 645 Deep Fritz 12 engine. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential. Intel Core 2 Duo E6405 dedicated to other cores. 2. Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 (LP) The final result is the sum of measured results. Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 2. Be aware that all Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 AMD Athlon II X4 650 The numbers in … POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400). AMD Athlon II X4 645 (rev. Laut Kompatibilitätsliste ist das schnellste was du auf das jetzige Mainboard packen kannst ein AMD Phenom II X6 1055T. AMD Athlon II X4 2.8 GHz Sort; Compare; gpu boss. AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Pentium G850 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. C2) C2) and Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 microprocessors. The charts in the section below illustrate performance of Athlon II X4 640 and Core 2 Duo E4500 processors in a number of different kinds of programs. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for several tests for each specific program type. technology. C3) Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D AMD Athlon II X4 620e dual-pass method and high quality settings. Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted. C3) The Athlon II X4 and the Core 2 Quad both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.. The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. I felt the MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 AM3/AM2+/AM2 NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE Micro ATX (mATX) was not an appropriate home server motherboard and therefore switched it to the slightly more expensive, but much better Gigabyte offering, the GA-880GM-UD2H Socket AM3 880G mATX. The test has much greater It utilizes a For Athlon II X4 640 charts, comparing multi- and single-threaded performance of this microprocessor with other Athlon II X4 processors and the fastest AMD and Intel x86 chips, please visit AMD Athlon II X4 640 … error margin than other tests. Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz, (c) Copyright 2003 - 2018 Gennadiy Shvets. All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink.   Pentium 4 800FSB and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. Intel Core 2 Duo E8290 Intel Core i3 3110M vs AMD Athlon II X4 640 ... Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X4 640. Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 The 'Overall performance' displays an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each task type. Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as AMD 640 and E4500, however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different. Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip AMD Athlon II X4 651 For in-depth GPU comparisons with the HD i3 530, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against: On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 zum Shop 58,99 € AMD FX-8320. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons. We put the 3.3 GHz 3220 to the test against the 3 GHz 640 to find out which you should buy, the older Intel or the AMD. The numbers in … Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine. Sort; Compare; gpu boss. …" Fazit "This is a quad-core processor that sometimes fell … – The AMD’s Athlon ii X4 640 is an older processor from AMD but is still good enough to stand against the Intel’s Sandy Bridge Core i3-2100. AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 processors were tested using different system Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent In my workstations, I use quite a few Gigabyte boards, and they have been problem-free for me. zum Shop 85,99 € Intel Pentium G4560. Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using single-pass method and high quality settings. format to H.264 format using high quality settings. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Measures the number of frames, converted by one CPU thread from MPEG2 AMD Athlon II X4 651K 0 Comments. format by all CPU cores using the best possible compression. Based on 27,864 user benchmarks for the AMD Athlon II X4 640 and the Intel Core i3 550, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,276 CPUs. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock). DirectX support from version 7 to version 9. Das Mainboard unterstützt nur CPUs bis 95W. local instance of Apache 1.3.41 web server. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the … Executes MikoFPU, RandMeanSS, FFT and Mandelbrot FPU-dependent tests The former processor was tested on ASRock M3A780GXH/128M motherboard … C3) Shows the number of SQL requests per second served by MySQL server In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon II X4 640 is noticeably better than the Intel Pentium G3258 3.2GHz when it comes to running the latest games. Core i3-530 2.93GHz is a middle-class CPU based on the 32nm, Nehalem architecture. Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by all CPU cores Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by a single CPU core from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method. Intel Core 2 Duo E6540 Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the CPUIDs section. AMD Athlon II X4 631 Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz. 1. FLAC format using the best possible compression. gaming performance. In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon II X4 640 is massively better than the Intel Core i3-530 2.9GHz when it comes to running the latest games. method. In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon II X4 640 is significantly better than the Intel Core i5-650 3.2GHz when it comes to running the latest games. Different steppings of Intel processors may also have slightly different features. Weitere Angebote aus dieser Produktgruppe. Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged ASROCK M3A780GXH/128M The Athlon II X4 and Core i3-530 2.9GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 AMD Athlon II X4 615e performance. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics 1. Measures integer and floating-point performance of a single CPU core Shows an average number of very simple static HTML pages served per Please see the Benchmarks section for an exhaustive list of benchmarks, showing performance difference between AMD Athlon II X4 640 and E4500 in various types of programs. In rare cases, measured frequency may differ from official specifications. zum Shop 85,99 € AMD Athlon II X4 640 …   K10 Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 Ein Phenom II X6 1090T würdest … Detailed side by side comparison of Athlon II X4 640 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 specs can be found in the Specifications section below. GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. AMD Athlon II X4 605e (rev. Below is a complete set of AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Core i7-6700 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. encrypted using Blowfish algorithm. Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 Search the site / Identify CPU / Quick CPU lookup: Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in The 2nd generation Intel Core i5-2400 processor delivers an improved automatic performance, thanks to its Intel … AMD Athlon II X4 638 Here are some valid searches: Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' With 4 cores, the Athlon II X4 is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X4 640 : … technologies, disabled in BIOS or by a virtual machine, will be shown as not For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced. What this means is the Core i3-530 2.9GHz will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. E0) The Core i3-530 2.9GHz has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. ssd boss.   Intel Celeron 2 GHz one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU adapters (VID), listed below: MB - Motherboard(s): CPUBoss. Reports the number of songs, converted from WAV to FLAC from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion Measures CPU speed by evaluating chess board positions using Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading and the last level cache. components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns Intel Core 2 Duo E8190 In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i7-920 Quad 2.67GHz is massively better than the AMD Athlon II X4 640 when it comes to running the latest games. More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. The numbers in each of these … using all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results. reports a CFD cycle frequency in Hertz. Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 … Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Runs Fibonacci, Napierian, Eratosthenes and QuickSort integer by running 6 different algorithms, and calculates a weighted score INTEL DP965LT, RAM - Memory: Higher clock speed. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35 For detailed specifications of "AMD Athlon II X4 640" or "Intel Core 2 Duo E4500" parts please click on the links in the table header. ssd boss. Shows an average number of dynamic HTML pages served per second by v5.0.27, running on the same computer. to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics Much more l2 cache. Both the AMD Athlon II X4 640 and the Intel Core i3-530 2.9GHz have the same number of threads. AMD Athlon II X4 600e Intel Core 2 Duo E6305 Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 AMD Athlon II X4 655, i5-3570K The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, … AMD Athlon II X4 620 system and video memory. AMD Athlon II X4 630 (rev. The Athlon II X4 has a 1536 KB bigger L2 cache than the Core i3-530 2.9GHz, and although the Athlon II X4 does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area. Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated AMD Athlon II X4 2.6 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Measures performance of read, write and modify operations in main The numbers in each of these columns correspond Solves specific computational fluid dynamics problem, and second by local Apache 1.3.41 web server. AMD FX-6300. In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Xeon Processor E5450 is very slightly better than the AMD Athlon II X4 640 when it comes to running the latest games. AMD Athlon II X4 635 (rev. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 3. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the AMD Athlon II X4 640 The Athlon II X4 has one thread per physical core, whereas the Core i3-530 2.9GHz uses hyperthreading and has 2 logical threads per physical core. Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete C2) Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors AMD Athlon II X4 641 The Athlon II X4 features the next-generation AMD Direct Connect Architecture for a fast, responsive PC. AMD Athlon II X4 605e (rev. based on the results. Evaluates Read, Write, Read/Write and Cache memory bandwidth score. CPUBoss. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 0 Comments. AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. Athlon II X4 640 is a performance processor based on the 45nm, K10 micro-architecture. Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 (LP) AMD Athlon II X4 640 (rev. number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination. Bear in mind, then, that while the Athlon II X4 has a 0.07 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by all CPU cores per one minute. performance tests on all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results. I made a few tweaks to the test setup over the previous review. performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second). However, they still can be used to estimate whether wPrime benchmark measures time taken by all logical processors to E0) 3 GHz. The Athlon II X4, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all. Reports the number of songs, converted by a single CPU core from WAV to "Just a notch above the Athlon II X4 630 in AMD's range, the Athlon II X4 640 has a slightly higher clock speed of 3.0 GHz instead of 2.8 GHz. The Core i3-530 2.9GHz has a 22 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Athlon II X4, and was created with a 13 nm smaller manufacturing technology. This test does not scale beyond For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance. resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 Der Prozessor AMD Athlon II X4 640 wurde in einem Vergleichstest (Keine Platzierung) der Zeitschrift PC Games Hardware durchgecheckt. and dividing averaged result by the number of threads. Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably. The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Core i3-4160 microprocessors. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much. Reports encryption speed of pre-defined 32KB text block. Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs. Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by one CPU core per one minute. Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon II X4 640 is massively better than the Intel Core i3-530 2.9GHz when it comes to running the latest games. The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming. The Athlon II X4 has 2 more cores than the Core i3-530 2.9GHz. after the decimal point in the number Pi. in the tables below. My first WHS was also built on a Gigabyte motherboard, so I fi… – The Athlon ii X4 is a quad core processor while the Intel’s … In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon II X4 640 is marginally better than the Intel Core i3-3220 3.3GHz when it comes to running the latest games. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. We put the 2.93 GHz E7500 to the test against the 3 GHz 640 to find out which you should buy, the older Intel or the AMD. Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated Based on 55,410 user benchmarks for the AMD Athlon II X4 640 and the Intel Core i5-6300HQ, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,276 CPUs. Intel Pentium 4 640 vs AMD Athlon II X4 640 ... CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Pentium 4 640 vs the AMD Athlon II X4 640. The test has much greater None of the components were overclocked. AMD Athlon II X4 610e error margin than other tests. full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance. 1. supported. any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors utilized internal timer to measure CPU frequency. The data is As a result, performance in individual benchmarks may be better or worse than what you see in the charts on this page. The Athlon II X4 was released less than a year after the Core i3-530 2.9GHz, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games. Intel's in games and other 3D tasks. Operations Per Second). memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of Intel Core2 Duo E7500 ... Athlon II X4 640 … calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431 (32M). Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 The numbers in … Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings. single thread by measuring data compression and decompression speeds, AMD Athlon II X4 630 (rev. AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits AMD Athlon II X4 635 (rev. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4, VID - Video card(s): image using CINEMA 4D software engine. graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Intel Core 2 Duo E4200 Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 If you found the comparison useful please consider sharing it: Please visit AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors. 73 product ratings 73 product ratings - AMD Athlon II X 4 3.0 GHz Quad Core 640 Processor, ADX640WFK42GM, AM2+ / AM3   AMD 3.3GHz 8MB. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck. 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine. Estimates MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second) rating of a retrieved from actual processors using CPUID instruction, and we also on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading 2 MB. Measures compression and decompression speed of random data in KB per second. performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second). AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Core i5-2400 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. Intel Core 2 Duo E8600, AMD Athlon II X4 2.5 GHz AMD Athlon II X4 631 (65W) 6 CPU cores.